Genetically Engineered Trees

 

Since 1999 GENET collects and distributes information on various topics in the field of genetic engineering in agriculture, food production and health. With this "Special Topic: GE Trees" GENET aims at providing an overview about the worldwide debate on genetically engineered trees, based on our archives.

 

Databank Query 1: "trees" as key word in the GENET-news text

 

You will find a selection of publications in the section "Research & Reports". To get more information about the different stakeholders in the debate, please follow the internet links to selected actors in the civil society and industry sectors. Finally, the page "GE Trees and the CBD" introduces you into the international debate about a moratorium on GE trees that is ongoing at the Convention for Biological Biodiversity.

GENET-news articles

2008-05-30 | permalink

Belgium government refuses approval for GE poplar field trials

On Monday, the Environment and Health Ministers (Magnette and Onkelinx) have refused the authorization for a field trial on GE poplar trees in Gent, asked by the VIB (Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie). The trees would have been modified to produce less lignin and facilitate the production of agrofuels. VIB can still appeal.

2008-05-28 | permalink

European Commission flies in the face of European Parliament on GE trees

In the Resolution of 24th April on preparations for the meeting of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) in Bonn, Germany, the European Parliament: ”Urges the Commission and Member States to: Ensure that COP9 adopts a final decision to ... agree a moratorium on the environmental release, including field trials, and commercial used of genetically modified trees.” However, the European Commission is refusing to follow this line. It is therefore defying not only the European Parliament, the Precautionary Principle, many EU member states and countries in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Island States.

2008-05-09 | permalink

GMO poplar trees set to be marketed in Belgium

Greenpeace is deeply concerned about the favourable recommendation that has just been issued by the Biosafety Council in the dossier on genetically-modified poplar trees. Greenpeace does not question that field testing carries only a limited risk with the proviso that all precautionary measures be taken. Nevertheless, the risks for the environment and for biodiversity in the event that the trees are marketed would be considerable. The environmental organisation thus admonishes the Ministers in charge of the dossier, first and foremost Minister of Environment Magnette, to bear these long-term negative consequences in mind. Greenpeace asks the Ministers to apply the precautionary principle and not to undertake a course that may lead to the marketing of genetically-modified trees.

2008-05-05 | permalink

GM pines cleared of risk to the environment in New Zealand

A trial cultivation of genetically modified pine trees in the open has shown no demonstrable risk to the environment, says research agency Scion. The Crown Research Institute says its field trial in Rotorua had not led to any modified gene transfer to other organisms or any discernible impacts on insects which live or feed on the trees, or bug life in the soil. Dr Tom Richardson, Scion chief executive, told the Herald yesterday these were the key areas under investigation and the result was that there were no detrimental effects from exposure to the genetically modified pines.

2008-03-24 | permalink

The threat of GM trees

While genetically manipulated crops carry on being the subject of vigorous polemics and resistance around the world as more and more data is gathered on contamination, yield failures, increased use of agro-poisons and impacts on health and the environment, new threats are looming with growing pressure from companies to introduce GM trees. The principal motive of the industries concerned is to produce raw material more cheaply for paper and celluose for ethanol at the cost of increasing the harsh effects of forestry monoculture on the environment, on forests, on indigenous and afro-descendant communities and on rural families.

2008-02-26 | permalink

International protest demanding a ban on GM trees

On 19 February 2008, a large number of civil society organizations sent an open letter to the Convention on Biological Diversity’s Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice, currently meeting in Rome, expressing their ”deep concern” about genetic engineering of trees. In only one week, the letter was signed by 138 organizations in countries where research on the genetic engineering of trees is being carried out, (or has in recent years).

2008-01-21 | permalink

Phytoremediation of volatile pollutants through genetic engineering

A direct method for enhancing the effectiveness of phytoremediation is to overexpress in transgenic plants the genes involved in metabolism, uptake, or transport of specific pollutants. This can be readily achieved for many plant species by using Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated plant transformation. Since phytoremediation is generally more effective when using large, fast-growing plants, the focus has been on poplar trees. Depending on the hybrid and particular clone, reasonable transformation frequencies can be achieved in poplar.

2008-01-17 | permalink

GE protesters chop down trees at research institute in New Zealand

Nineteen trees, some genetically modified, have been cut down in an apparent protest against Crown forestry research institute Scion. Those responsible for the attack dug under the Rotorua institute’s perimeter fence and left behind a spade with a sticker saying ”GE Free New Zealand”. It is unknown exactly when the attack occurred but the trees were discovered slashed on Monday and police were called.

2007-12-28 | permalink

What happens when genetic engineering comes to the forest?

Some proponents hope that the chestnut will be the first transgenic forest tree to confront federal regulators. (Forest trees, unlike the bioengineered plum and papaya, pose special issues because they have relatives in the wild.) They see it as a good test case because the chestnut is a tree that the public genuinely desires, and the environmental risks are lower since few chestnuts still exist in the forests. As Robert Kellison, former head of the Institute of Forest Biotechnology, put it in a 2006 interview: ”We need to get something through the system so we can set an example.” That’s exactly what many experts and environmental activists worry about.

2007-12-19 | permalink

Oregon State University (USA) starts non-GE tree breeding programme

A new move toward ”marker based breeding” with economically important forest tree species is expected to improve and speed up the identification of trees with desirable traits – to achieve faster growth, drought resistance, wood quality or other useful characteristics. [...] These programs, researchers say, do not involve genetic engineering, which is the intentional change of genetic structure or introduction of novel genes into plants, and an approach that has also met significant public resistance and regulatory hurdles.

Go to page: ← ... 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... →

Home: GENET

GE Trees: NGOs and Social Movements

 people's Forest Forum

The Global Ban on GM Trees Campaign was released by three Finnish non-governemental organisations in January 2004. The open petition protested decicion made in UN Climate change meeting in Milano to include transgenic trees in their climate toolbox. This desicion violated the biodiversity and biosafety agreements and prozesses.

 Stop GE Trees Campaign

The Stop GE Trees Campaign is a national and international alliance of organizations that have united toward the goal of prohibiting the ecologically and socially devastating release of genetically engineered trees into the environment. Global Justice Ecology Project coordinates, administrates and fundraises for the campaign. World Rainforest Movement, based in Uruguay, is the Southern Hub for the Campaign and has materials in Spanish and Portuguese.

 Genetically Modified Trees

Information by the World Rainforest Movement

  • WRM publications on GM Trees
  • Articles published in WRM bulletin
  • WRM special bulletin on GM Trees
  • Video "The Silent Forest"
  • Other relevant information
  • Links

GE Trees: Biotechnology Industry and Science

 Institute for Forest Biotechnology

The Institute promotes the responsible use of biotechnology in forest trees.  We advance the societal, environmental, and economic benefits biotechnology can bring to forests around the world.  The Institute of Forest Biotechnology (IFB) is the only non-profit organization to address the sustainability of forest biotechnology on a global scale.

 ArgorGen

Trees are the world’s most plentiful and versatile source of renewable materials and an important resource for bioenergy. ArborGen is dedicated to improving the sustainability and productivity of purpose grown working forests, providing more wood on less land while preserving native habitats in all their diversity and complexity for future generations.

 Tree Biosafety and Genomics Research Cooperative

The goal of the Tree Biosafety and Genomics Research Cooperative (TBGRC) is to conduct research, technology transfer, and education to facilitate beneficial uses of genetically engineered trees in plantations. The TBGRC seeks to test and develop select innovations, based on progress in molecular biology and agricultural biotechnology, that will ultimately have commercial value to wood-growing and horticultural industries. Research is presently focused on poplars as scientific models for genetic engineering and functional genomic studies.